- Discrete PCA - Wray Buntine
- Perspectives Seminar
Thursday, March 5, 2009
Friday, February 27, 2009
Friday, February 20, 2009
Monday, January 26, 2009
Sunday, December 21, 2008
FIRE 2008 at Kolkata
FIRE (Forum For Information Retrieval Evaluation) Workshop 2008 at Kolkata, Dec 13-15
Talks
Donna Harman - failure analysis
Xerox - Nicola Cancedda - CCA for EU langs
Kalervo Jaervelin - Finland - morph analysis
Noriko Kando, Tatsuya Sakai - NTCIR, Galaxy of Words - interaction in IR
Doug Ouard - Univ. of Maryland
Carol Peters - CLEF
Mark Sanderson - Diversity in results (evaluation using clustering)
CLIA (Cross-Lingual Information Access) - an-India project (IITB/K, IIITH,ISI,JU,AU) - building IR for Indian lang + building resources for that (dic,corp,Ont,Rules etc.)
Runs
JHU - n-grams,skipgrams, lang-indep
Univ. of Neuchatel (Jacques Savoy) (recommended reading by Donna Harman) - various techniques - Okapi,BM25, DFR (prob), LM (stat), tf.idf, data fusion
Others
Measures - MAP is the most preferred, Prec. vs. Recall also used, Performance never discussed
People - Manoj Chinnakotla, Vishal Vachnani, Ashish Almeida, Pavitro Mitra (IITKgp)
Upcoming confs
NE workshop at ACL-IJCNLP - NE task - Dates - Task details - Jan 31 - Paper submsn - May 01 - acl-ijcnlp-2009.org/workshops/NEWS2009
Workshop in CLIA - talks and papers - search.iiit.ac.in/CLIA2009 - Dates: Mar 06 - paper subm
Discourse Anaphora and Anaphora Resolution Colloquium (DAARC2009) - Nov 5-6 2009, Goa - www.au-kbc.org/daarc2009 - Dates: April 25 - pap subm,
Talks
Donna Harman - failure analysis
Xerox - Nicola Cancedda - CCA for EU langs
Kalervo Jaervelin - Finland - morph analysis
Noriko Kando, Tatsuya Sakai - NTCIR, Galaxy of Words - interaction in IR
Doug Ouard - Univ. of Maryland
Carol Peters - CLEF
Mark Sanderson - Diversity in results (evaluation using clustering)
CLIA (Cross-Lingual Information Access) - an-India project (IITB/K, IIITH,ISI,JU,AU) - building IR for Indian lang + building resources for that (dic,corp,Ont,Rules etc.)
Runs
JHU - n-grams,skipgrams, lang-indep
Univ. of Neuchatel (Jacques Savoy) (recommended reading by Donna Harman) - various techniques - Okapi,BM25, DFR (prob), LM (stat), tf.idf, data fusion
Others
Measures - MAP is the most preferred, Prec. vs. Recall also used, Performance never discussed
People - Manoj Chinnakotla, Vishal Vachnani, Ashish Almeida, Pavitro Mitra (IITKgp)
Upcoming confs
NE workshop at ACL-IJCNLP - NE task - Dates - Task details - Jan 31 - Paper submsn - May 01 - acl-ijcnlp-2009.org/workshops/NEWS2009
Workshop in CLIA - talks and papers - search.iiit.ac.in/CLIA2009 - Dates: Mar 06 - paper subm
Discourse Anaphora and Anaphora Resolution Colloquium (DAARC2009) - Nov 5-6 2009, Goa - www.au-kbc.org/daarc2009 - Dates: April 25 - pap subm,
Monday, March 24, 2008
IIIT Hyd's work
Indian language font/script related
- identifying language of given text
- identifying encoding of given text
- developing a metaformat for uniformity
- converting from one encoding to another
Techniques used - TF*IDF, Glyph assimilation, IT3 (phonetic transliteration scheme)
Language and encoding identification (Anil Kumar Singh)
- choices -> (1) What kind of language modeling should be used for representing training texts? (2) Which similarity measure should be used for comparing the models obtained from the texts?
- Models -> (1) n-grams model
- Similarity measures -> (1) out of rank - sum[for all n-grams in test data: diff(rank of n-gram in test data,rank in training data)](2) mutual cross entropy (3) translator approaches (4) compare profiles of n-gram frequencies (5)
- orthographical features (based on letter sequences and frequencies)
- add-k smoothing
- pruning
- Monte Carlo sampling
- cross entropy
- Prediction by partial matching (Teahan and Harper 2001)
- Cavnar -> top 300 n-grams indicate language of text, bottom n-grams indicate topic of text
POS tagging for Gujarati using CRF's
- 26 POS tags, 600 tagged sentences, 5000 untagged sentences, 10000 training corpus (??)
- use CRF methods for tagging (why?)
- errors attributed to not enough training data
Similarity measures for sentence alignment
- weighted sentence length (charc,wordc,sig) -> Poisson (how?)
- word correspondence (based on distribution of words in the language??)
- NPC matching
- common word count
- syno/hyper nym intersection (using WordNet) -> for more abstract similarity measurement
- F-measure??
- identifying language of given text
- identifying encoding of given text
- developing a metaformat for uniformity
- converting from one encoding to another
Techniques used - TF*IDF, Glyph assimilation, IT3 (phonetic transliteration scheme)
Language and encoding identification (Anil Kumar Singh)
- choices -> (1) What kind of language modeling should be used for representing training texts? (2) Which similarity measure should be used for comparing the models obtained from the texts?
- Models -> (1) n-grams model
- Similarity measures -> (1) out of rank - sum[for all n-grams in test data: diff(rank of n-gram in test data,rank in training data)](2) mutual cross entropy (3) translator approaches (4) compare profiles of n-gram frequencies (5)
- orthographical features (based on letter sequences and frequencies)
- add-k smoothing
- pruning
- Monte Carlo sampling
- cross entropy
- Prediction by partial matching (Teahan and Harper 2001)
- Cavnar -> top 300 n-grams indicate language of text, bottom n-grams indicate topic of text
POS tagging for Gujarati using CRF's
- 26 POS tags, 600 tagged sentences, 5000 untagged sentences, 10000 training corpus (??)
- use CRF methods for tagging (why?)
- errors attributed to not enough training data
Similarity measures for sentence alignment
- weighted sentence length (charc,wordc,sig) -> Poisson (how?)
- word correspondence (based on distribution of words in the language??)
- NPC matching
- common word count
- syno/hyper nym intersection (using WordNet) -> for more abstract similarity measurement
- F-measure??
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)